Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Howard Salmon's avatar

I realy like this peice because it does more than retell the controversy. It reconstructs the atmosphere around it and makes clear how quickly a protest song became a political weapon in other people’s hands.

What I especially like is that you keep the focus on context. Without Rodney King, the acquittals, and the long history of LAPD brutality, the whole story gets flattened into the usual free-speech food fight. You avoid that. You make clear that the anger in “Cop Killer” did not emerge from nowhere, which is exactly the point too many people wanted to ignore at the time.

The double-standard argument is strong as well. The comparison with mainstream screen violence helps show that this was never just about violent content. It was about who was speaking, from what position, and who felt threatened by that speech.

Strong piece on a still-misunderstood flashpoint, and a good reminder of how fast cultural panic can turn into institutional intimidation.

AJDeiboldt's avatar

Fantastic piece Sonny. It almost seems quaint that people as high up as the president would denounce a musician for something like this. It's funny that they would get so upset about a reaction to events rather than at the events themselves.

It's also quaint (beautifully so) in how much controversy this song caused. If Cop Killer came out today, would it even move the needle all that much?

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?